By Noah Zon, Co-Founder and Principal at Springboard Policy, a public policy research and advisory firm.

The article explains why the federal government’s recent income tax cut is slightly less generous than it first appears. The government reduced the lowest federal tax rate from 15% to 14%. That lowers the tax charged on the first $58,523 of taxable income in 2026. However, the same lowest rate is also used to calculate many non-refundable tax credits, so reducing the rate reduces the value of those credits.

A point made by the article is that the tax cut argues that “most of the tax relief goes to people in the first two brackets”. It is important to remember that:

  • First bracket: taxable income up to $58,523
  • Second bracket: taxable income from $58,523 to $117,045

There is a significant difference between the first two brackets because the second one incudes people earning well above Canada’s median individual income of roughly $44,000. The report estimates that about 80% of the total tax relief goes to people in those two brackets, but that is partly because a very large share of taxpayers falls within them, not because everyone receiving the relief is low income.

Bottom line, it may not be regressive: Everyone who pays tax generally benefits, but people earning enough to use the entire first tax bracket receive a larger dollar saving than someone earning around $44,000.

This article was originally published on Noah’s substack on June 17, 2026.

Read full article

Related reading

A gradient background blending from bright pink in the top left corner to teal blue in the bottom right, with hints of gray and subtle color transitions throughout.

What history tells us about tax, trouble and the top one per cent

By Shirley Tillotson, Professor of history at Dalhousie University; expert advisor at the Canadian Tax Observatory | A version of this piece was originally published in the Halifax Examiner, February 25, 2026

A gradient background blending from bright pink in the top left corner to teal blue in the bottom right, with hints of gray and subtle color transitions throughout.

Income-tested and in-kind: The material wellbeing effects of the Canadian Dental Care Plan

By Geranda Notten, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa.

A gradient background blending from bright pink in the top left corner to teal blue in the bottom right, with hints of gray and subtle color transitions throughout.

A promising start: Automatic filing for low-income Canadians

By Régine Cléophat, Analyst, Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, previously held various teaching assistant positions at the undergraduate and graduate levels at HEC Montréal.

Get in Touch

Have feedback on the work we are doing? Interested in collaborating? We want to hear from you.

Get in touch

Stay Connected

Through solid, independent research and non-partisan public engagement, we aim to encourage fresh thinking that leads to practical solutions on tax policy.

Subscribe